I want to know more
about all the known paradoxes.
Can you address me to a good web source?
Thank you
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
-
Recent Posts
- See Hot Sexy Star Aishwarya Rai Videos In All Angles.
- THE CANTOR ARGUMENT SO FAR
- Solomon Feferman's notion of the "unfolding" of ZF
- Muddled query about models of ZF.
- CANTOR DISPROOF <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
- Peter Koellner's thesis
- See Hot Sexy Star Aishwarya Rai Videos In All Angles
- ANTI-CANTOR CLAIM
- KBH Word Coordinates for Shorter Text Messaging
- Con this be done without invoking AC?


"anbra1" <xyxanb…@tiscalixxxyxxx.it> writes:
> Can you address me to a good web source?
google.com
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> "anbra1" <xyxanb…@tiscalixxxyxxx.it> writes:
> > Can you address me to a good web source?
> google.com
I would also suggest "wikipedia.org", and search for "paradox". They
have a good summary of the subject.
Gene Ledbetter
anbra1 wrote:
> I want to know more
> about all the known paradoxes.
> Can you address me to a good web source?
> Thank you
Every principle you use to extract meaning from natural language is
invalid when applied to this meaningless sentence.
That’s all you need to know.
anbra1 wrote:
> I want to know more
> about all the known paradoxes.
> Can you address me to a good web source?
> Thank you
http://groups.google.com/group/selfref?lnk=li