As it turns out, it is an objective and scientifically verifiable
truth, what religions and  folklore describe for us under the name of
"other world" or "afterworld" (scientifically this other world is
called "counter-world"). This world does exist (although is hidden
from our insight into it), and the existence of it can be proven
scientifically in an objective manner. Below I am going to repeat for
your convenience and for your critical review, a most recent formal
scientific proof that this world inhabited by God (and also by us –
after we die) in fact does exist objectively. This most recent proof
is published, amongst others, on the web page "dipolar_gravity.htm" –
addresses of which are listed below. Because it is very short, I am
going to repeat it here, but firstly a few words of introduction and
explanations.

The historically first formal physical proof for the existence of the
counter-world was published in 2000 (means quite a long ago) in
subsections H1.1 to H1.1.3 from volume 4 of scientific monograph [1/4]
entitled "Advanced magnetic devices" (available free of charge from
the web addresses of the page "text_1_4.htm" listed below). In fact
this proof was repeated three times in the indicated subsections, each
time completed with a different physical methodology of scientific
proving. This in turn illustrates that the scientific proving of so
obvious matter as the existence of the counter-world, can be carried
out not just on one, but on many entirely different ways. The
scientific proof that "counter-world does exist" is quite important.
It confirms scientifically facts which are explained to us by
religions for thousands of years. Namely, it proves that this another
world, popularly called the "other world" (e.g. consider the saying
"they send him to the other world"), or "afterworld" (e.g. consider
the saying "he shifted to the afterworld"), in fact does exist
objectively. In turn this objective existence of the counter-world can
be confirmed in a scientific manner. From this in turn is just a small
step away from the scientific proving, that whatever religions and
folklore claim about God living in this other world, and about us
going in there after our death, is also an objective truth and can be
confirmed objectively with scientific methods. The scientific proof
that "counter-world does exist" is for us equally binding as all other
scientific proofs – for example as the proofs that the Earth is
spherical, or that sides of a right-angled triangle fulfill the
Pythagoras equation. For our own good we should rely on indications
resulting from this proof in everything that we do. After all, if we
do not consider it, then we are to stick to views and undertake
actions which run against truth – means which contradict the true
operation of the counter-world and the universe. In turn thinking and
acting contradictively to the truth and to reality, inevitably  brings
not very pleasant consequences to us. In turn if we consider in our
lives indications resulting from this proof, then in almost everything
that we do, we are inclined to make corrections for the existence and
influence of the counter-world on our lives and on the world around
us. This in turn is the key to us reaping fruits and rewards in the
future, which await for these who learned the truth and who recognize
it.

During my professorship at a Korean University in 2007, by some
strange act of God in the second semester – which coincided with the
update of the fifth edition of my most important scientific monograph
[1/5], I was granted the privilege of giving a series of lectures from
the mathematical logic. (My autobiography can be found on the
totaliztic web page named "pajak_jan.htm", my scientific findings
regarding God – including a formal proof that "God does exist"
completed with methods of mathematical logic similar to these
described here, can be found on the totaliztic web page named
"god.htm", while copies of free monograph [1/5] are available from the
web page "text_1_5.htm" at addresses provided below.) A "by product"
of these lectures was that to three previous versions of the formal
proof for the existence of the counter-world completed before with the
use of physical methods, I could add another version of the formal
scientific proof for the existence of the counter-world which this
time is completed with the use of methods of mathematical logic.
Because this proof is short, I am quoting it below for the use of
these readers who would like to get familiar with it, or wish to check
the validity of it. However, I would still encourage to reach for
further information regarding it, which is provided on the totaliztic
web page "dipolar_gravity.htm", and also in subsection H1.1.4 from
volume 4 of the newest monograph [1/5] (currently still in process of
writing) available free of charge from the web page "text_1_5.htm" at
addresses provided below. The base propositions of the above proof for
the existence of counter-world stem from attributes of so-called
"transverse waves" – the more extensive description of which is
provided in the web page "dipolar_gravity.htm" devoted entirely to the
description of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity – see items  #D1, #D2,
#D2.1 in there. But in order to save the reader reading these other
descriptions, I remind here briefly that "every wave is simply a
moving oscillation". Thus in every wave two directions of motion are
coexisting, namely the main direction in which a given wave moves, and
also the main direction in which occurs the oscillatory motion that
forms this wave. The "transverse waves" are simply such waves in which
the main direction of a given oscillatory motion is perpendicular to
the direction into which the entire wave moves. Most common examples
of "transverse waves" are waves on water. The "transverse waves" must
be clearly distinguished from the so-called "longitudinal waves" in
which both above componential directions of motion occur along the
same line. A most common example of longitudinal waves is probably a
home toy in which steel balls hang on strings in a row, like
pendulums, touching each other sideways. When we lift a first of these
steel balls and provide it with a pendulum motion, then with the use
this longitudinal wave this pendulum motion is transferred onto the
last ball, which repeats it, then then the motion is transferred back
onto the first steel ball, etc. So here it is, the entire formal proof
for the existence of the counter-world, completed with the use of
methods of mathematical logic:

Theorem:
"The counter-world does exist".
Basis propositions:
(1) "The electromagnetic waves display all attributes of the so-called
"transverse waves", and according to the present knowledge the
electromagnetic waves must propagate in exactly the same manner as all
known to us kinds of transverse waves do propagate. All known kinds of
transverse waves propagate exclusively along the border between two
mediums.
(2) The belonging of electromagnetic waves to the category of
transverse waves which propagate along the border between two mediums
means that in the space which these waves cross must either exist a
border of some sort between two mediums which occupy our physical
world, or must exists a border which remains invisible to our senses
and undetectable to our instruments and which separates our physical
world and the counter-world (the counter-world also remaining
inaccessible for us and undetectable for our instruments) – each of
these two worlds being filled up with a different medium. The fact
that electromagnetic waves propagate across space in which our
advanced physical instruments nor excellently provided and well paid
scientific laboratories are unable to detect neither the existence of
two different mediums, nor detect the existence of a border between
two different mediums, eliminates completely the possibility that
electromagnetic waves could propagate along a border between two
different mediums that fill up our physical world.
 (Explanation complementing this set (2) of premises: The cross-volume
propagation of electromagnetic waves researched by our science,
occurring through the space which for our measurement instruments
appear as filled up with an uniform medium, combined with simultaneous
behavior of these waves as if they propagate along the border of two
different mediums, may only then take place, when these waves
propagate along the surface of two different worlds, means along the
border of our physical world, and some other world which remains
inaccessible to our senses and undetectable to our instruments, and
which is filled up with a different medium than our physical world.
Since this other world had no scientific name so-far, the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity which discovered and described it, named it the
"counter-world".)
 (3) The counter-world does NOT exist, or does exist. The propagation
of electromagnetic waves along the border between our physical world
and this counter-world eliminates completely the possibility that the
counter-world does NOT exist.
 Proof:
(1) The first basis proposition is to be transformed with the use of
tautological form of the method known under the name of "hypothetical
syllogism". This form can be written as [(p =>q) && (q => r)] => [p =>
r], in which the assertion "p" says "the electromagnetic waves display
all attributes of the so-called transverse waves", while the assertion
"q" says "according to the present knowledge electromagnetic waves
must propagate in exactly the same manner as all known to us kinds of
transverse waves do propagate", in turn the assertion "r" states "all
known kinds of transverse waves propagate exclusively along the border
between two mediums". The transformation of these propositions implies
the conclusion that "the electromagnetic waves propagate exclusively
along the border between two mediums".
(2) Accepting this previous conclusion for an assertion in the next
phase of
…

read more »

–
A guide to accounting
by Michael Lalonde

For all of your tax needs visit
wanderer tax solutions in Sudbury

investing into your rrsp funds can drastically
reduce the amount of tax you owe at the end of the
fiscal year. spousal rrsp contributions are also
eligible for this. if you earn over $60,000 per year
you may wish to offset your higher tax bracket through
rrsp\’s. wanderer tax solutions can assist you with your
financial needs and small business accountings.

mike lalonde
michael lalonde
sudbury

Hi there guys

I have recently launched my new science site

www.gl-science.com

It is just an online resource with science articles and i created it
so i could uplaod any revison notes i make from my degree

And im wondering if you could give me some feedback on the site, i
posted here because you lot probably know the most about my niche area

Any one who gives feedback can have there site link listed on my site,
or there business e.t.c

Thanks

Different words express different ideas, and their meaning can be
understood in the light of their context.  The meaning of certain
words has been specially defined; while in the case of others it can
be obtained by dividing them into parts.  But no fixed rule can be
laid down.  Certain conditions must, however, be satisfied.  In
certain other cases we can do as we like.

Words and their meaning:  Different words express different ideas of
action, because we have to do different things; but if we repeat the
same word without a different cause, it would be useless.  But for
instance, we should be able to get the meaning from the context.  If
there is a reference to the full moon, the subject matter should
indicate it even though there is no mention of its form.  However, if
words convey different meanings in different context, we cannot use
them in the same sense everywhere.

More is explained on this subject at:
http://www.narachphilosophy.com/the_law_of_action_and_the_method_of_i…

I am using Microsoft Word 2003 and need to write some texts about
Modal logic.

The stupid but real problem:

What is the realsymbol for the box.

Microsoft word puts a box for every unprintable character.
But how do i make sure that i am using the real box?

They obviously are professional dirt throwers. Their profiles reveal
that some of them write tens of thousands of messages almost without
breaks.
They are ignorant in matters they write. Their writing mainly contains
personal insults and general statements.
They are members of a larger organization. They "hunt" and sabotage
constructive discussion in packs. When they sabotage a message a whole
pack of them is spitting and biting like a pack of wolves.
They are always wearing masks, while their behavior resembles these
"frogs that come out of the mouth of the dragon" about which
prophesizes the Book of Revelation, 16:13-14.
They all use the same style of writing and spitting – as if they are
clones or robots which use the same program.
They are well trained, because they do their spitting, sabotages, and
personal attacks very skillfully. They are good psychologists who aim
at negative emotions. They always impose their dominance over a given
discussion and then dictate their tone to all.
They have all information at their fingertips. They can state who,
where, and when at any their wish. This means they must have access to
extremely powerful databases.
But simultaneously they do NOT know human culture. Their writing is
full of errors and deviates from normal standards used in a given area
they pretend to know.
They are consistently negative in their opinions, and if they enter a
discussion their motivation is to harm the author, to scare the
passers by, and to sabotage the constructive discussion.
They attack mainly progressive and moral ideas. Simultaneously they
leave uncommented everything that splashes dirt over someone or
something.
The groups that they sabotage are "by coincident" flooded also with
other filth, porno, indecency, spam, etc.
They act on practically every group and on every forum – so they
represent some powerful force or organization which is interested in
turning the Internet into a gutter.
They seem to be above law, as many statements they make balance on
borders of offenses, but they do NOT seem to be afraid anyone or
anything.
Someone must pay them, because they do their spitting as a full time
job and as their main occupation.
In turn their sabotaging efforts are increasingly well visible on this
group – one would need to be blind to NOT notice their evil efforts.

Who are these guys? What kind of force stands behind them? Who pays
them? In whose interest lies that because of their action Internet
gains the reputation of the gutter which collects the biggest dirt of
humanity?
Perhaps we should look more carefully at their hands to find out what
they are up to and what evil power they represent.
There is a good opportunity for looking closer at them, because they
also sabotage the constructive discussion on this group.

We are seeking far to spot terrorists. But here we are, just under our
noses some well camouflaged evil force is terrorizing the information
artery of humanity scaring out from it all moral and progressive
ideas.
It will NOT take very long and these internet terrorists are going to
scare and to terrorize everyone so much, that soon no person will be
courageous enough to write about any progressive or moral idea.

With totaliztic salute, Jan Pajak (Prof. Dr Eng.)

Dear all,

I’m looking for the generalization of the Quine-McCluskey algorithm in
case the underlying domain is not two-valued but d-valued (d is a
natural number).

More precise below.
Let x1,…,xn be n variables with range {1,…,d}. At atomic proposition
is "xi in A" for some 1<=i<=n and a subset A of {1,…,d}. A formula is
a boolean combination of atomic propositions. An implicant of a formula
f is a conjunction of atomic propositions that implies f. A prime
implicant g of f is an implicant of f so that there is no other
implicant f’ of f so that g implies f’.
Decision problem: given a formula, find its all prime implicants.
Combinatorial question: give a sharp upper bound on the number of prime
implicants of a formula.

Any help, references, ideas are appreciated.
Thanks a lot
Sasha

1) mathematics

I
i
iI
Ii
iIi
IiI
.
.
.
N-1
(above our finites, noncountinous)
N
N+N
N*N
(above are cyclical infinities)
N!
(N!)!
.
.
.
(above are continous infinites)
0 – existential, nothing, non-finite, non-cyclical infinity, non
continous infinity

2) statistics

medians
means. gaussian average of medians
ends – gaussian average of means
T-test – probability of means, means will have a noise factor
F – test – probability of ends, ends will have a noise factor

need to analyze noise, to get T,F
noise analysis
non-pattern, complete noise, medians, of noise
find means of medians, noise factor, of T,F
requires significant computing to do noise analysis on noise, analog
computing best
so, T,F are a long term goal
in the mean time you know medians are existentials (I,i) etc., you know
means and ends, so you can determine the ways of existentials, buy a
kernel of the above existentials (soles)

–
Dale http://www.vedantasite.org
see website for real email address

–
Dale http://www.vedantasite.org
see website for real email address

Greenhelm Engineering is looking for volunteers who wish to make a
difference by applying their engineering and technical skills. To get
involved in the Greenhelm projects or to learn more about the
organization, please visit www.greenhelm.com .

Greenhelm Engineering is a non-profit professional organization that
works to strengthen communities and  eradicate poverty through
implementing engineering solutions that improve life conditions.

Greenhelm was founded in June 2007 by a group of engineering students
from Canada and Germany willing to apply their knowledge and their
ideas to help people in need.

Our goal is to apply our knowledge and engineering skills to implement
basic technological improvements in regions where  people’s well being
depends on them.

Greenhelm volunteers are trying to balance the fulfillment of human
needs with the protection of the natural environment, thus
contributing to a safe and sustainable development.

On Sep 4, 3:08 pm, "Timothy Golden

BandTechnology.com" <tttppp…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>    Well, as I listen to Mr.Rodrian’s piano sonata

http://www.archive.org/details/COMPLETE_MOZART_PIANO_SONATAS

>> Ha! Those are by Mozart.
>> Last time "I" wrote a piano
>> sonata it caused such hysterics
>> (of laughter) that I
>> was briefly held on a charge
>> of attempted homicide
>> (of my listeners).

> Sorry… interpretation…

>>> I wish we could discuss the relation of
>>> thermodynamics and gravity.

VISIT THOU:   http://physics.sdrodrian.com

It’s all there. Could it be simpler? I doubt it:

Look … There is a slight misconception abroad in the
land that a thermodynamic current can only arise when
there is suddenly "more of something" to flow away
towards where there is "less of it." [Suggesting that
because "something" cannot arise from "nothingness"
only an act of "magic" could have given rise to he
universe.] However, the fact is that regardless of how
tenuous the broad/infinite expanse of Nothingness was,
all that was really required was that "somewhere" the
"Nothingness" should become even more tenuous still
than generally, and then a thermodynamic current would
have inevitably flowed towards that blessed spot. And
because of Newton’s laws of motion, that "spot" would
have eventually become our universe (the concentration
of so many, many somethings). SEE:

                http://physics.sdrodrian.com

Think of the "visible" universe as a sort of eternally
"shrinking" black hole "singularity" (of course, this
is only a poetic exaggeration, since obviously,
"singularities" are physically impossible in our
reality–all you need do is look around you).

  Fortunately, because there is nothing to which to
  compare "the size" of the universe… it will
  "always" remain the biggest thing in existence, no
  matter how "smaller" it may go on to become.

   Where can you find more on all this? Hello:
          http://physics.sdrodrian.com

Note, however, that "gravity" is not the simple effect
of this "shrinking" (no matter what the speed of this
shrinking may actually be).

Consider: In an elevator in perfect "free-fall" there
is no "effect of gravity." If you are inside it and
drop Newton’s apple it will simply "float" in place.
You need to add 1) an acceleration to the "speed" at
which something falls, vs/and 2) a "floor" not moving
away from Newton’s apple with a matching speed:

Think of the earth’s ground (in the latter case, or #2
above): The relatively uncollapsing "framework" of the
earth’s matter keeps it from going into any sort of
"free-fall" (observable by us)… unlike what happens
to an actual black hole star’s "ground." Therefore the
falling Newton’s apple can only accelerate until it
hits the earth’s surface. Why should it/does it
accelerate at all?

  The reason for this acceleration is that the
  "shrinking" universe is "an energy-conservation
  engine." [In "shrinking" the universe is forever
  hopelessly forced to observe the conservation of
  angular momentum law--Yes, the same effect one
  sees when a spinning skater pulls in his arms.]

The "body" of the "shrinking" universe is forever
growing "tighter" (or, going from being larger/slower
to smaller/faster). An "acceleration" by any name: The
entire universe is experiencing an acceleration in
merely "existing." Or, the "smaller" it grows the
"faster" it grows smaller… forever.

  This is the reason why for a dozen or more
  years before astronomers finally discovered
  that the universe’s "expansion" was
  accelerating I despaired of ever discovering
  the footprint of that acceleration I knew HAD
  to be taking place in ANY imploding universe.

If our "Newton’s apple" were falling into an actual
black hole star, its acceleration would almost
certainly continue until it very nearly matched that
of the shrinking universe itself–even if but "always"
only just "nearly."

This acceleration ("towards shrinking" of/at every
point in the universe) means that EVEN if our elevator
(above) were itself in complete "free-fall," when you
dropped Newton’s apple it would NOT just float "in
place" but would actually begin to gradually "fall."
And THAT effect is what we normally "observe"/describe
as the observable "effect of gravity." Very subtle on
earth’s surface, very pronounced on a black hole
star’s. Why?

 Because this effect/interaction is one which is
 strictly between quantities of mass/matter/energy:

In our experience, the effect of this acceleration is
identical to the conventional description of "gravity"
in any way you would care to measure it: Since the
"universal singularity" ["the universe"] is shrinking
unto itself, it will "appear" to interested observers
as if nearby bodies are "pulling" at each other [and
not just the elevator floor, obviously]… in other
words, if you suppose a "pulling" to be the case,
Newton’s apple appears to be pulling at the elevator’s
floor and vice versa.

And because, to all practical ends, every "point" is
the center of the universe ["down" is strictly only a
"relative" term], it is "the sum centers of mass" that
are the "points" toward which the surrounding mass
is/are "shrinking" (i.e. obviously, "space" plays no
part whatsoever in "shrinking" … and therefore the
"illusion" of weaker/stronger "gravitational fields").

  The "distance" between two nearby bodies will
  diminish more than/long before the "distance"
  between them and bodies farther afield" (because
  all groups/conglomerations are "moving" ["down"]
  towards the sum of all their mass’ centers) and
  therefore away from everything else "outside" them.

There is nothing "personal" about this, it’s merely
that the universe is "so big in comparison to the bit
under consideration" that, to all practical effects…
every such bit of the universe can be described as its
"center." [The universe is everywhere "shrinking"
towards its everyplace ... not "slurping" wholesale
towards its whatever singular sum center.]

  Individual stars, planets … and related/very
  close but "untouching" conglomerations will be
  "shrinking" into a point "in space" which is the
  center of the sum of their added mass: the
  earth/moon system, as well as solar systems,
  galaxies, galaxy groups, et al … and so forth
  outwards with every surrounding and
  correspondingly independent conglomeration of
  mass/energy from the smallest subparticle to the
  entire universe itself (which you may choose to
  call "gravitational systems" if you still believe
  in gravitons).

As one continues to pull back one will always observe
all whatever groupings of such conglomerations to be
behaving as if they were independently "associated
super-conglomerations" BECAUSE they will always be
"shrinking" towards the center of the sum of their
total mass. And so it will continue (as you "pull
back") until the entire universe itself will be "seen"
as behaving as if it were one single "associated
conglomeration," [not a "singularity" of course].

  The effect can be "observed to be" extremely
  subtle or extremely pronounced (depending on the
  amount of mass, and its organization, whether
  more compact or more spread out/insubstantial.
  The crucial factor being the amount of mass in a
  given volume observed, and not necessarily how it is
  distributed across that volume… again, because
  what matters always is "how much mass/matter is
  falling towards the sum of its mass’ center, or
  [see above] the closer a sum of mass/energy is to
  itself, the more it will be moving away from
  everything else afield.

As the independent conglomerations "shrink into
themselves" the distance between them will naturally
increase … subtly with proximity and increasing with
distance so that very distant galaxies will seem to be
speeding away from each other at nearly the speed of
light (there is no natural law against something
moving faster than the speed of light,*  but "catching
sight of something moving away faster than the speed
of light" is always problematical, even if only
philosophically).

  * Einstein’s restriction comes from his assumption
  that the "Fitzgerald contraction" (that all matter
  contracts in the direction of its motion) was true
  [as truly a whoppingly moronic explanation of why
  the speed of light is constant as is "dark energy"
  to explain why the universe’s "apparent expansion"
  is accelerating). But having assumed that, Einstein
  was left with the fact that this moronic assumption
  demanded that matter could only contract "so much"
  and then could not possibly contract any "mucher" (a
  reflection of his state of mind, I imagine). ergo:
  The "numbers" told him that at 7/8th the speed of
  light a 12-inch ruler would contract to 6 inches,
  and so forth, until at the speed of light his ruler
  would have contracted to zero–And, as a ruler can
  then contract no further, Einstein left himself no
  wiggle-room to imagine any speed greater than that
  of light. Neat, eh! Unfortunately for Einstein,
  smart as he was, the "facts" upon which he built his
  Grand Temple were rotten and, eventually, it shall
  all tumble down, I’m afraid. (You will be able to
  tell when this is happening by the number of rats
  leaving the edifice … and whether they will be
  sauntering out, or scrambling like … rats).

Of course, the actual distance between galaxies, as
measured by a yardstick outside the universe, will
actually be "shrinking." But, since we can only
measure such distances with our own "shrinking"
galactic yardsticks… such distances must therefore
forever appear to us to be increasing! An effect which
is clearly discernible to us as the "illusion" that
the galaxies are everywhere moving away from each
other at rates of speed "surprisingly" related to how
"distant" they are from each other.

Needless to say, any silly goose first coming upon
this peculiar motion of the galaxies away from each
other … with a brain empty of the knowledge I have
…

read more »