Logic — math, philosophy & computational aspects

logic, math, philosophy, math games, math help, mathematical logic, philosophy of education, math facts




Archive for December, 2009

Re: A question to Mr. Kant Where is space?

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

>Dear Mr. Seidel,

>I’ts true: I cannot answer the question if space is or if it is not.
>But I did not deny space just for fun or to give some ckrackpots of
>your century the oppurtunity to deny the existence of the world .

>If space is a physical entity which is _not_ nothing. You may call it
>"field" or "ether" or devide it into small pieces playing a little
>around with "dimensions" – as long as it is something and not nothing.
>You may think about space as a whole – finite or infinite, or about
>that 10 cm^3 of space in front of you.

>And every physical entity must be _somewhere_.

>Then Mr. Seidel tell me:

>Where is space?

>Everything is in space we use to say without thinking you say. So
>space would be in space too. We would have two spaces at the same –
>what – space? So there were three spaces. And so on. Again, it is
>true, if you do not hide my thoughts behind a philosophical slang, my
>answer is: There is no space. But if you think your thought to it’s
>end, your answer is: There is an infinity of spaces in the same space.

>At least one of us must be wrong.

>Yous

>Immanuel Kant

gee, mr. kant…you seem to be so much sillier, less grammatical, and
pointless from the other side of the grave.  what happened?

colin.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (3)

logic minimization algorithm

The best algorithm I know for logic function minimization is
Quine-McCluskey’s, but it is not very efficient in some cases (when
removing all prime implicants leaves some minterms uncovered). Seems
the algorithm is something like O(n^2) with n the number of variables.
I’m interested in finding some study about the efficiency of Q-M
algorithm. Are there better algorithms than that? Thanx in advance.
Joaquin Lopez

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

PAIAS – The GALILEO Vs. ARISTOTLE GRUDGE MATCH!

sci.physics, sci.physics.research, sci.research, sci.classics,
sci.logic, sci, alt.sci.physics.new-theories

First try: Nov. 13, 1995 CE
Second try: Nov. 15, 1995 AD

Dear Science and Physics Lovers!

After going down in defeat centuries ago, he’s back!

ARISTOTLE is BACK! and HE’S BAADD!!

The Palo Alto Institute for Advanced Study
Presents:

The GALILEO Vs. ARISTOTLE GRUDGE MATCH!

Check it out at:
http://www.paias.com/pagessci/galari.htm/

The current champion, GALILEO, has agreed to go 3 rounds
with the still world-infamous ex-champion, ARISTOTLE!

Only 3 Rounds, so DON’T BLINK!

It’s QUICK, it’s PAINFUL!

Three minutes out if your busy day, tops!

Time is SO important for a busy Scientist or Physicist!

"A CHEAP SHOT AT SCIENCE!" says one reviewer.
Science says… "OUCH!"

Nov. 13 is going to be somebody’s UNLUCKY DAY!

Make that Nov. 15.
(I made the mistake of trying to simultaneously post to all
groups, and it got hung up in a moderated group and didn’t
get posted anywhere that I can find.)

That’s http://www.paias.com/pagessci/galari.htm/

If that doesn’t work, try:
http://www.paias.com/

"One of the most difficult things for a science teacher
to deal with is the heavy dose of pseudoscience and
sloppy reasoning which pervades the popular culture."
— from somewhere out there on the net

Michael Knowles
PAIAS
mknow…@paias.com

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Chaos in Turing Machines

I’ve been wondering about something. Perhaps some work
in this field has already been done.

Does chaos in Turing Machines make any sense ?

If the TM doesn’t halt, is it automatically chaos
(if the concept is applicable) or does there have to
be a special kind of non-halting behavior that should
be closer to what we normally think of chaos?

Thank you.

                                Regards, Mark
                                http://www.smns.montclair.edu/~hubey

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (24)

Math Books (Sale)

I have the following books for sale :

Please note the books condition:

Brand New = (!)           Good    = (***)
Excellent = (****)        Average = (**)             Poor = (*)

————————————————————————–

- S. Wolfenstein, Introduction to Linear Algebra and Differential
  Equations, Holden-Day, 1969, $25 (***).

- H. Zassenhaus, The Theory of Groups, Chelsea, 1949, $25 (***).

- E. T. Whittaker, G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, Cambridge,
  1927, $25 (***, soft cover).

- I. M. Yaglom, Geometric Transformations, Random House, 1962, $19 (***,
  soft cover).

- A. G. Webster, Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics,
  Second Edition, Dover, 1933, $25 (***, soft cover).

- H. A. Taha, Operations Research: An Introduction, Second Edition,
  MacMillan Pub. Co., 1971, $19 (***).

- T. V. Narayana, Lattice Path Combinatorics with Statistical
  Applications, University of Toronto Press, 1979, $22 (****).

- L. M. Rose, The Application of Mathematical Modeling to Process
  Development and Design, Halsted Press, 1974, $22 (***).

- B. Z. Vulikh, Introduction to Functional Analysis, Addison-Wesley Pub.
  Co., 1963, $22 (***).

- I. N. Vekua, Generalized Analytic Functions, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.,
  1962, $25 (***).

- P. Suppes and S. Hill, First Course in Mathematical Logic, Blaisdell
  Pub. Co., 1964, $19 (***).

- E. D. Rainville, P. E. Bedient, A Short Course in Differential
  Equations, Sixth Edition, Macmillan, 1981, $25 (****).

- A. J. Pettofrezzo, Vectors and Their Applications, Prentcie Hall, 1966,
  $25 (****).

- J. A. Murtha, E. R. Willard, Linear Algebra and Geomoetry, Holt
  Reinheart Winston, 1969, $22 (****).

- R. G. Bartle, The Elements of Real Analysis, Wiley, 1964, $19 (**).

- H. L. Pazer, L. A. Swanson, Modern Methods for Statistcial Analysis,
  Intext Educational Publishers, 1972, $22 (****).

- P. E. Pfeiffer, Concepts of Probability Theory, McGraw Hill, 1965,
  $19 (***).

- J. S. Bendat and A. G. Piersol, Measurement And Analysis of Random
  Data, John Wiley & Sons, 1966, $19 (**).

- R. E. Walpole and R. H. Myers, Probability and Statistics for Engineers
  and Scientists, 2nd ed., Macmillan, 1978, $19 (**).

- K. Knopp, Elements of The Theory of Functions, Dover, 1952, $15
  (***, soft cover).

- H. Jeffreys, Cartesian Tensors, Cambridge University Press, 1961, $15,
  (***, soft cover).

- K. Knopp, Infinite Sequences and Series, Dover, 1956, $15, (***, soft
  cover).

- K. Knopp, Theory And Application Of Infinite Series, Hafner Pub. Co.,
  2nd ed., 1923, $22 (***).

- K. Knopp, Theory of Functions, Part I & II, Dover Publications, 1945 &
  1947, $22 (****).

- R. C. Jeffrey, The Logic of Decision, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago
  Press, 1983, $25 (****).

- R. C. Jeffrey, Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits, McGraw Hill, 1967,
  $25 (****).

- E. R. Stabler, An Introduction to Mathematical Thought, Addison Wesley,
  1953, $19 (****).

- T. Vicsek, Fractal Growth Phenomena, World Scientific Pub. Co., 1989,
  $19 (****), soft cover.

- P. W. Zehna and R. L. Johnson, Elements of Set Theory, Allyn and Bacon,
  1962, $25 (****).

- W. H. Richardson, Finite Mathematics, Harper & Row Publishers, 1968, $19
  (****).

- J. Bebernes and D. Eberly, Mathematical Problems from Combustion Theory,
  Springer Verlag, 1989, $25 (!).

- H. K. Crowder and S. W. McCuskey, Topics in Higher Analysis, the Macmillan
  Co., 1964, $22 (****).

- M. R. Kinsolving, Set Theory and The Number Systems, International
  Textbook Company, 1967, $19 (****).

- J. Breuer, Introduction to The Theory of Sets, Prentice Hall, 1958,
  $19 (****).

- M. D. Larsen, Fundamental Concepts of Modern Mathematics, Addison Wesley,
  $19 (****).

- A. H. Lightstone, Symbolic Logic and the Real Number System: An Introduction
  to the Foundations of Number Systems, Harper & Row Publishers, 1965, $19
  (****).

- E. J. Cogan, Foundations of Analysis, Prentice Hall, 1962, $19 (****).

- V. G. Sprindzuk, Mahler’s Problem in Metric Number Theory, American
  Mathematical Society, 1969, $23 (***).

- D. N. Clark, G. Pecelli, and R. Sacksteder, Contributions to Analysis and
  Geometry, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981, $24 (****).

- M. S. Livsic, Operators, Oscillators, Waves (Open Systems), American
  Mathematical Society, 1973, $22 (****).

- G. A. Freiman, Foundations of a Structural Theory of Set Addition,
  American Mathematical Society, 1973, $22 (****).

- N. I. Achieser and I. M. Glasmann, Theorie Der Linearen Operatoren im
  Hilbert-Raum, Springer Verlag, 1960, $23 (****).

- J. R. Rice and R. F. Boisvert, Solving Elliptic Problems Using ELLPACK,
  Springer Verlag, 1985, $23 (****).

- J. A. Hummel, Introduction to Vector Functions, Addison Wesley, 1967,
  $23 (***).

- R. Katz, Axiomatic Analysis: An Introduction to Logic and the Real Number
  System, D.C. Heath & Co., 1964, $23 (***).

- R. D. Mattuck, A Guide to Feynman Diagram in the Many-Body Problem, McGraw
  Hill, 1967, $22 (***).

- F. F. Ling and I. G. Tadjbakhsh, eds., Recent Developments in Applied
  Mathematics, Rensselaer Press, 1983, $23 (!).

- R. T. Seeley, Calculus of Several Variables, Scott Foresman & Co., 1970,
  $19 (****).

- G. Stephenson, Matrices, Sets and Groups: An Introduction for Students of
  Science and Engineering, American Elsevier Pub. Co., Inc., 1965, $19
  (***).

- P. C. Shields, Linear Algebra, Addison Wesley, 1964, $19 (***).

- D. Saracino, Abstract Algebra: A First Course, Addison Wesley, 1980,
  $19 (***).

- J. T. Moore, Elements of Abstract Algebra, Allendoerfer Advanced
  Series, The Macmillan Company, 1962, $22 (****).

- B. L. Van Der Waerden, Modern Algebra, Vol. I, Frederick Ungar
  Pub. Co., 1940, $25 (***).

- A. Clark, Elements of Abstract Algebra, Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1971,
  $22 (***).

- C. B. Hanneken, Introduction to Abstract Algebra, Dickenson Publishing
  Co., 1968, $22 (****).

- L. J. Paige and J. D. Swift, Linear Algebra, Ginn and Co., 1961, $22 (***).

- B. L. Van Der Waerden, Modern Algebra, Volume I, Frederick Ungar Publishing
  Co., 1964, $22 (****).

- W. E. Barnes, Introduction to Abstract Algebra, D.C. Heath & Co., 1963,
  $22 (***).

- C. W. Curtis, Linear Algebra: An Introduction Approach, 2nd ed., Allyn
  and Bacon, Inc., 1968, $22 (***).

- J. Gilbert and L. Gilbert, Elements of Modern Algebra, 3rd ed., PWS-Kent
  Publishing Co., 1992, $22 (!).

- R. L. Finney and D. R. Ostberg, Elementary Differential Equations with
  Linear Algebra, Addison Wesley, 1976, $12 (**).

- E. A. Walker, Introduction to Abstract Algebra, Random House, 1987, $22
  (****).

- W. A. Granville, P. F. Smith, and W. R. Longley, Elements of The
  Differential and Integral Calculus, Blaisdell Pub. Co., 1962, $19 (***).

- M. R. Spiegel, Applied Differential Equations, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall,
  1967, $17 (***).

- M. Brawn, Differential Equations and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Springer
  Verlag, 1975, $25 (***).

- E. L. Ince, Ordinary Differential Equations, Dover Publications (Hardcover),
  1926, $19 (***).

- S. B. Norkin, Differential Equations of the Second Order with Retarded
  Argument, American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1972, $25 (!).

- J. S. Vandergraft, Computer Science and Mathematics: Introduction to
  Numerical Computations, 2nd ed., Academic Press, 1983, $25 (!).

- J. Stoer and R. Bulirsh, Introduction to Numerical Analysis,
  Springer Verlag, 1980, $35 (!).

- N. S. Kurpel, Projection – Iterative Methods for Solution of Operator
  Equations, American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1976, $25 (****).

- H. G. Campbell, An Introduction to Matrices, Vectors, and Linear
  Programming, Meredith Pub. Co., 1965, $22 (***).

- M. L. James, G. M. Smith, and J. C. Wolford, Applied Numerical Methods
  For Digital Computation with Fortran and CSMP, Harper & Row Pub., 1977,
  $22 (***).

- G. A. Bekey and W. J. Karplus, Hybrid Computation, John Wiley & Sons,
  1968, $22 (****).

- D. D. McCracken and W. S. Dorn, Numerical Methods and Fortran
  Programming with Applications in Engineering and Science, John Wiley
  & Sons, 1964, $25 (****).

- F. R. Ruckdeschel, BASIC Scientific Subroutines Vol. II, McGraw Hill,
  1981, $22 (****).

- A. L. Edwards, Statistical Analysis, Revised edition, Holt Rinehart
  Winston, 1960, $15 (***).

- A. L. Edwards, Statistical Analysis for Students in Psychology and
  Education, Rinehart & So., 1956, $10 (***).

- H. M. Walker and J. Lev, Elementary Statistical Methods, 3rd ed., Holt
  Rinehart Winston, 1969, $12 (****).

- P. R. Rider, An Introduction to Modern Statistical Methods, John Wiley &
  Sons, 1939, $10 (***).

- M. Rosenblatt, Random Processes, Oxford University Press, 1962, $19 (***).

- B. Harris, Theory of Probability, Addison Wesley, 1966, $19 (***).

- J. L. Devore, Probability & Statistics for Engineering and The Sciences,
  Brooke/Cole Pub., 1982, $19 (****).

- Z. W. Birnbaum, Introduction to Probability and Mathematical Statistics,
  Harper & Brothers Pub., 1962, $19 (***).

- G. W. Mackey, The Theory of Unitary Group Representations, University of
  Chicago Press, 1976, $17 (***).

- J. J. Martin, Bayesian Decision Problems and Markov Chains, Wiley, 1967,
  $19 (***).

- B. W. Lindgren, G. W. McElrath, Introduction to Probability and
  Statistics, Third Edition, MacMillan, 1966, $19 (****).

- A. C. Pipkin, Lectures On Viscoelasticity Theory, 2nd edition, Springer-
  Verlag, 1986, $15 (!), Soft Cover.

- P. Fulde, Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids, Second
  Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1993, $15 (!), Soft Cover.

- R. B. Reisel, Elementary Theory of Metric Spaces, Springer-Verlag, 1982,
  $15 (!), Soft Cover.

- D. Moller, Ed., Advanced Simulation in Biomedicine, Springer-Verlag,
  1990, $17 (!), Soft Cover.

- Z. Ma, M. Rockner, Dirichlet Forms, Springer-Verlag, 1992, $17 (!),
  Soft Cover.

- D. V. Chudnovsky, G. V. Chudnovsky, H. Cohn, M. B. Nathanson, Eds.,
  Number

read more »

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comment (1)

Alfred Korzybski

Has anyone out there read Korzybski’s "Science and Sanity."  If so,
what did you think of it?

Rick

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

problem

I have a little problem here that I was wondering if someone could
help me with (this is for my Psychology class, and I can’t figure
out an answer)

Lets say that you are given 12 balls, 11 are exactly the same
weight, and one is more or less by a small amount.  You are given
a balance which has two pans that can hold 12 balls in either pan,
and you are allowed to use the balance to weigh the balls three
times.  Find out if the different ball is heavier or lighter than
the other balls, and then find out which ball it is.  As a hint,
our teacher told us that you are supposed to weigh four balls in
one pan at the beginning of the first weighing, but he did not
tell us how many balls are to be put in the second pan to be
weighed against the first.  Thank you for your help.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (4)

The unscientific way to refute

In a post earlier I had come to the aid of a person whom I had assumed was
intelligent and worthy. I now find myself having to apologize. I was
wrong. An indication of logic at work is the examination of a body of work
(specifically the human biological clock) whereby the scientific method
would be the examination of the work and the attempt to disprove the
judgements. Scientific methods and logic NOT at work is shown below.
Anyone else requesting (yes it was requested) a copy of the work in it
finished entirety is welcome to receive it via email.

In a message dated 95-11-19 05:40:12 EST, you write:

>Subj:       notice
>Date:       95-11-19 05:40:12 EST
>From:       e,,,,,,@a,,,,.a,,.edu (M,,, A,,,,,)  (to provide protection of the
infermed)
>Reply-to:   e,,,,,,@a,,,,.a,,.edu
>To: trion…@aol.com

>After reading the large number of messages you sent, it is clear to me
>that I could spend a very long time just trying to clear up the
>misconceptions you have.  If you were a nice person, and if I had nothing
better to do,
>I might embark upon such a program.  Since neither is true, I think I
will
>not waste my time.

Sets up the prey.. Establishes domination. Concludes not to do anything,

>I leave you with some serious advice which you would do well to follow:

Does something. So therefore a lie has been told. Advice is meant to be
excused
as it is the imparting of wisdom. Wisdom he is convinced he alone can
impart.

>(1) Learn something about the subject you wish to discuss before
attempting
>to do so.

Establishes two things: 1) Admits not to understanding anything expressed
and
2) Establishes the dominance claimed in the preamble.

>(2) Do not attempt to make up for lack of knowledge by a facile use of
>technical terms.  This will only work on people who do not understand
those
>terms or who cannot see through your bluffs.

Establishes 1)The non understanding. 2) Admits a perceived motive for
having
been given the opportunity to examine the work of another. It must only
have been
to conceal something. Since something is not understood it must be wrong.
And since
it must be wrong it must be for a reason. It must be to confuse.
3)Confusion is the
art of deceipt. A person who can not add one more in thought sees all
things that
are different from his perceived judgement as being alterior and personal.

>Mark

Signs name in singular first name to establish no personal vendetta. When
in fact
there is nothing shown to denote otherwise.
The even though " If you were a nice person, and if I had nothing better
to do,

>I might embark upon such a program.  Since neither is true, I think I
will
>not waste my time." He lies again and feels the need to establish further

dominance. Only a person who knows not to be in such a position will over
do
the opportunity. And since his doing anything at all is a ‘waste of time’
he further
wastes everyone’s time.

>P.S.  I do not know why you feel compelled to barrage others with your
>unwanted email.

The act of submission is attacked and decalred unwanted. Not because it
was
not desired to review as it all has been by admission read. Showing the
time
to digest just not the stomach for knowledge unless that knowledge matches
internal belief structures.

>If I had to speculate, I would assume that it is a
>combination of obsession and of defensiveness.

Misinterprets passion for obsession and the refusal to be attacked as
defensiveness.

>No doubt you have spent
>years annoying professionals with your crackpot notions, and the
experience
>has left you deeply frustrated and embittered.

Seeks to establish the reason for the motive.

>Now you are reduced to
>a scattergun approach in any attempt to capture the attention and
approval
>of random strangers.

Misinterprets submission as seeking approval. Facts do not require
approval.
And approval implies superiority. Being shown herein as impossible.

>You have never had my approval, and now you have
>lost my attention.

Establishes dominance and throws up the hands in disgust at the audacity
of
anyone to challenge a belief structure.

>In future, unsolicited messages from you will be
>deleted and ignored.

The ultimate power stance. Not only will he refuse to be educated he will
even
refuse to be addressed.

>–
>Mark A,,,,, (e,,,,,,@a,,,,.a,,.edu)

So, who is this man anyway? He has placed himself in the position of
dominance.
That makes him king of the hill. All one has to do is look up and there he
is. Above
everyone else. Oh, I’m sorry not everyone else just those who disagree
with him.
A simple.  ’I don’t agree’ would have sufficed. But not to a person with
an even
clock speed. ‘I don’t agree’ must be expressed in terms of dominance.
Humility is one
mark of the wise. Arrogance is one mark of the…….\\

Not a single point of contention was made. Yet the entire thing was
attacked.
Interestingly noted as to the reason why science makes slow strides. It is
loaded
with people who won’t take the next step because it is not the step they
have
already taken.

Lee Kent

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Q: Davis/Putnam – urgent!

I heard about a method to speed up propositional reasoning developed by
Davis/Putnam. Could somebody please explain the idea of this method and/or give
some good reference?

Thanks, bye, Uli

—————————————————————-
Ulrike Sattler            RWTH Aachen (University of Technology)
Theoretische Informatik, Ahornstr. 55, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
Phone: +49/241/80 4566
Fax:   +49/241/8888 360       u…@informatik.rwth-aachen.de

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

GRAND UNIFICATION HYPOTHESIS

GRAND UNIFICATION HYPOTHESIS

If you might be interested in a 200+ page document correlating
known physical phenomena to a singular Ultimate Supreme Being,
please ask me to E-mail its Table of Contents to you for your
perusal.  All reasonable questions will be answered in this
regard.  Subjects include gravitational force simulation by a computer,
particle schemes based upon random field events and the
Contracting-Universe hypothesis.


——————————————————————————-
zyxzyx                                    __  __     ____  ___       ___ ____
zyx…@primenet.com                      /__)/__) / / / / /_  /\  / /_    /
                                        /   / \  / / / / /__ /  \/ /___  /——————————————————————————-

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments